Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games – An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
The indirect evolutionary approach integrates forward-looking evaluation of opportunities and adaptation in the light of the past. Subjective motivation determines behavior, but long-run evolutionary success of motivational types depends on objective factors only. This can justify intrinsic aversion to inequality in reward allocation games, though earlier analysis has typically been restricted to a particular game. We consider a more complex environment by combining two games that – studied in isolation – yield opposite implications for inequality aversion. Persistent divergence between intrinsic motivation and true material success is possible. It depends on the type of inequality aversion considered and, importantly, agents’ ability to discriminate between the qualitatively different games they face.
منابع مشابه
The Lobbying, Bribery, and Compliance: An Evolutionary Model of Social Factors
Abstract Connecting to rule-makers in order to set favorable rules (lobbying) or paying government executives to bend the current rule (bribing) are the two main strategies for influencing government. This study in an evolutionary game model explain why bribing may become widespread while other states like compliance and cooperative lobbying are Pareto superior. The theoretical model is used ...
متن کاملRisk Averse Behavior in Asymmetric Matching Pennies Games
This paper studies several variants of 2 × 2 games with unique mixed strategy equilibria, which we call asymmetric matching pennies games. In experimental studies of behavior in these games, observed choice frequencies are typically much different from the mixed strategy Nash predictions. This paper reports experimental results for a variety of such games, and shows that a structural econometri...
متن کاملA within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
We assess the predictive power of a model of other-regarding preferences—inequality aversion—using a within-subjects design. We run four different experiments (ultimatum game, dictator game, sequential-move prisoners’ dilemma and public-good game) with the same sample of subjects. We elicit two parameters of inequality aversion to test several hypotheses across games. We find that within-subjec...
متن کاملSocial Preference, Incomplete Information, and the Evolution of Ultimatum Game in the Small World Networks: An Agent-Based Approach
Certain social preference models have been proposed to explain fairness behavior in experimental games. Existing bodies of research on evolutionary games, however, explain the evolution of fairness merely through the self-interest agents. This paper attempts to analyze the ultimatum game's evolution on complex networks when a number of agents display social preference. Agents' social preference...
متن کاملInequality Aversion in Ultimatum Games with Asymmetric Conflict Points -- A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis --
Assuming inequality averse subjects as modeled by Fehr and Schmidt (1999) or in the ERC model by Bolton and Ockenfels (2000) in ultimatum games with asymmetric conflict payoffs allows to make predictions especially concerning responder acceptance thresholds. These predictions are tested in a laboratory experiment eliciting proposer offers and respondent’s acceptance thresholds using the strateg...
متن کامل